Cursor AI, Inc.
Cursor AI, Inc. develops an AI-native code editor and software development environment that integrates large language models into the coding workflow to help engineers write, refactor, and understand code more efficiently. The company serves software developers and engineering teams, monetizing through subscriptions to its hosted and team-oriented plans.
- No-Code & Low-Code Platforms
- MLOps & ML Platforms
- Revenue
- $6.0M
- Employees
- 55
- Founded
- 2022
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, United States of America
What 177 Arbolus experts think of Cursor AI, Inc.
NPS scores cluster at the 8-10 range, signaling high satisfaction and strong user advocacy, though a small minority (NPS 4-6) express concerns. Most users are in advanced implementation phases (MoreThan1Year), indicating high stickiness, with positive renewal intent common among high spenders and influential roles. The primary sentiment drivers are productivity gains and workflow integration balanced by caution around code accuracy and privacy. Key feedback themes highlight robust productivity, strong context integration, and a need for continued improvement in AI accuracy and repository flexibility.Overall Customer Sentiment: Positive
Who reviewed Cursor AI, Inc.
- C-Suite 72% (127)
- Director 20% (35)
- Manager 9% (16)
Employer names and spend open in the full report, along with the other 174 customers.
Everything 177 customers told us about Cursor AI, Inc..
Employer names, spend, renewal intent and every written answer behind the numbers on this page.
Sentiment
54 Net Promoter Score, from 177 scored reviews- Promoters 108
- Passives 57
- Detractors 12
Cumulative NPS by month
+0 over 6 months- May 9
- Jun 9
- Jul 9
- Aug 9
- Sep 9
- Oct 9
Net Promoter Score across 6 reviews, accumulated up to each month. Category median 51 across 6 companies.
Praised
- Greater Customization and Cost Flexibility
- Improved Model Quality and Privacy Protections
- Expanded Codebase Context and Integration
- Productivity and Routine Coding Gains
Criticised
- Required Security and Controlled Environments
- Reliance on Repository Lock-In
- Competing AI Coding Tools
- AI Hallucinations and Reliability
What customers say
Renewal intent
Plan to renew 75%Plan to renew, by seniority
- 74% 50 answers
- 83% 12 answers
- 100% 1 answer
- 50% 2 answers
- 9/10 Average score from customers who will renew
- 7.9/10 Average score from undecided customers
- 6.3/10 Average score from customers not renewing
Top alternatives
Most weighed by Cursor AI, Inc. customersReport
For people who use Cursor AI, Inc.
Do you use Cursor AI, Inc. at work?
Share your software review and get matched to paid projects. Arbolus pays you every time a client reads your review.
- 177 customers of Cursor AI, Inc. have already contributed
Takes a few minutes. Your identity stays anonymous.