Clinical Ink

clinicalink.com · Berwyn, United States of America

Clinical Ink is a clinical technology company that provides electronic clinical outcome assessment (eCOA), eSource, and decentralized clinical trial solutions to pharmaceutical, biotech, and contract research organizations. Its platform captures patient- and site-reported data electronically at the point of care or remotely, aiming to improve data quality, reduce trial timelines, and support hybrid and virtual study designs. The company generates revenue through software licensing, technology-enabled services, and implementation and support fees for clinical trials globally.

  • Electronic Health Records
  • Clinical Trial & Research Software
Revenue
$90.0M
Employees
450
Founded
2007
Headquarters
Berwyn, United States of America

What 25 Arbolus experts think of Clinical Ink

NPS scores for Clinical Ink reflect a predominance of positive sentiment (scores 7-10 comprise the majority), particularly among large pharma and operations executives. Renewal intent is generally high among key spenders and influencers, with only small pockets of uncertainty among user roles. Most customers are well into full implementation or piloting, signaling strong product stickiness. Common praise centers around project kickoff, integration benefits, user interface simplicity, and site/staff satisfaction. Weaknesses, where cited, focus on feature breadth and complex protocol handling. Overall Customer Sentiment: Positive

Who reviewed Clinical Ink

Total customers 25 23 current · 2 former
Reviews growth +14 in six months
Seniority of respondents
  • C-Suite 60% (15)
  • Director 36% (9)
  • Manager 4% (1)
Operations Leader Director NPS 9 Will renew
Operations Leader Director NPS 7
Other Leader C-Suite NPS 10 Will renew

Employer names and spend open in the full report, along with the other 22 customers.

Everything 25 customers told us about Clinical Ink.

Employer names, spend, renewal intent and every written answer behind the numbers on this page.

Open the full report

Sentiment

0 Net Promoter Score, from 25 scored reviews
  • Promoters 6
  • Passives 13
  • Detractors 6

Cumulative NPS by month

+0 over 6 months
  • Mar 7
  • Apr 7
  • May 7
  • Jun 7
  • Jul 7
  • Sep 7

Net Promoter Score across 7 reviews, accumulated up to each month. Category median 26 across 7 companies.

Praised

  • Modular Expansion & Deeper Integration
  • Platform Consolidation Trend
  • Faster Data Delivery and Quality
  • Responsive Project Management

Criticised

  • Platform Unification and Agility
  • Switching Driven by Integration Needs
  • Competitive Feature Breadth
  • Analytics and Data Integration Gaps

What customers say

Responsive Project Management
“Project setup and initiation went smoothly, timelines were met, and the Clinical Ink project management team was better than other startup teams from competing vendors.”
Ease of Use and Regulatory Support
“The user interface is not complex, making it easy for site staff to handle changing site scenarios, and the platform consistently delivers data compliance for regulatory purposes.”
Superior Integration Capabilities
“I chose Clinical Ink because integration with different data sources actually worked during our demos and enabled smoother data management across the clinical trial ecosystem.”

Renewal intent

Plan to renew 60%
  • Will renew 9
  • Undecided 5
  • Not renewing 1

Plan to renew, by seniority

  • C-Suite 40% 10 answers
  • Director 100% 4 answers
  • Manager 100% 1 answer
  • 8.7/10 Average score from customers who will renew
  • 6.8/10 Average score from undecided customers
  • 5/10 Average score from customers not renewing

Top alternatives

Most weighed by Clinical Ink customers

Report

For people who use Clinical Ink

Do you use Clinical Ink at work?

Share your software review and get matched to paid projects. Arbolus pays you every time a client reads your review.

  • 25 customers of Clinical Ink have already contributed
Share your experience

Takes a few minutes. Your identity stays anonymous.